August 2, 2007
Ultimately Less Libidinous
The Porn Myth, by Naomi Wolf
This is the best bit from an otherwise silly and regressive article… the “money shot” of sorts:
“Does all this sexual imagery in the air mean that sex has been liberated—or is it the case that the relationship between the multi-billion-dollar porn industry, compulsiveness, and sexual appetite has become like the relationship between agribusiness, processed foods, supersize portions, and obesity? If your appetite is stimulated and fed by poor-quality material, it takes more junk to fill you up. People are not closer because of porn but further apart; people are not more turned on in their daily lives but less so.”
C’mon, Naomi “Pining for Orthodoxy” Wolf, there’s no erotic intensity when you screw through a hole in the sheet.
August 2nd, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Good old States of 18th century puritanic lifestyle!
August 2nd, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Markus: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
August 2nd, 2007 at 5:00 pm
Someone tell Naomi that the porn problem stems from male reproductive biotechnological obsolescence:
As dispensable as the grainy, 21-second MP3!
August 2nd, 2007 at 6:26 pm
I agree with her. She has some good points.
August 2nd, 2007 at 11:12 pm
Rod: Sure, she has some good points, but there’s no turning back the clock.