Stock Du Jour (LEN) & Random Observations | Home | Attacking in Another Direction

August 2, 2007


Ultimately Less Libidinous

The Porn Myth, by Naomi Wolf

This is the best bit from an otherwise silly and regressive article… the “money shot” of sorts:

“Does all this sexual imagery in the air mean that sex has been liberated—or is it the case that the relationship between the multi-billion-dollar porn industry, compulsiveness, and sexual appetite has become like the relationship between agribusiness, processed foods, supersize portions, and obesity? If your appetite is stimulated and fed by poor-quality material, it takes more junk to fill you up. People are not closer because of porn but further apart; people are not more turned on in their daily lives but less so.”

C’mon, Naomi “Pining for Orthodoxy” Wolf, there’s no erotic intensity when you screw through a hole in the sheet.

5 Responses to “Ultimately Less Libidinous”

  1. Markus said:

    Good old States of 18th century puritanic lifestyle!

  2. C. Maoxian said:

    Markus: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

  3. Steve Austin said:

    Someone tell Naomi that the porn problem stems from male reproductive biotechnological obsolescence:

    As dispensable as the grainy, 21-second MP3!

  4. Rod said:

    I agree with her. She has some good points.

  5. C. Maoxian said:

    Rod: Sure, she has some good points, but there’s no turning back the clock.

Post your opinion