Episode 129 ... Victor Haghani (42:49)
- Father was a goods trader (Sephardic Jew born in Iran?)
- Went to University in London (LSE)
- His dad said go for the less bureaucratic firm (why he chose Salomon over JP Morgan)
- John Merriwether asked him to become a trader, government bonds arb desk
- Youngest trader on the desk
- He had been in fixed income research at Salomon Brothers
- Merriwether left Salomon in 1992, Haghani left in late 1992 ... founded LTCM
- Started LTCM's London office
- Worked for 13 bank consortium after LTCM failed in 1998 ... helped liquidate portfolio
- JWM Partners hedge fund ... also helped start that
- Founded Elm Partners five years ago ... "active index investing"
- Lowenstein's "When Genius Failed" -- a good read, but not 100% accurate
- Dunbar's book is also OK
- Buy the Harvard Business School case studies on LTCM, by Andre Perold
- We're a product of our experiences
- Haghani wrote paper on biased coin flip
- Gave 61 subjects (financial professionals) $25, coin biased 60% heads, could keep whatever they made after 30 minutes of flipping, capped at $250
- [Sounds similar to Van Tharp's old experiment that he has given hundreds of times]
- [Van Tharp gave subjects bag of ten marbles: Seven 1R losers, one 5R loser, two 10R winners. Subjects got 40 marble pulls and a $100,000 bankroll. Expectancy is 0.8R (positive) but most people end up broke because their bet size is too large and they revenge trade]
- People bet a lot on tails :-) ... usually after a streak of heads [laughing]
- People believe random things have some sort of predictability (human experience versus math)
- People got bored of betting on heads [laughing again]
- 1/3 of people went bust betting on a 60:40 biased coin
- 1/5 reached max payout ... kids who could flip really fast with smaller bet size mainly
- 1/2 won $80
- Using simple rule of only betting 15% of bankroll would give 95% chance of hitting max payout within 30 minutes
- "Suboptimal behavior"
- Nearly everyone voluntarily bet their whole stake at some point
- Those all-in bets *always* happened after someone took a loss on an outsized bet, classic need to "get it back"
- People who busted didn't want to talk about it
- A whole range of bet sizes works (8 or 9% to 20%) to hit max payout within 30 minutes
- Kelly Criterion number (optimal bet) was 20%
- Optimal solution is very complicated, but just use heuristics (common sense)
- Without the cap, expected value would be $3,000,000, 4% return on every flip (betting 20% of bankroll)
- St. Petersburg Paradox ... expected value versus expected utility
- People won't bother to play even if they have positive expected payout
- Have to understand your own risk aversion
- Betting 50% gives negative expected utility (with 60:40 coin)
- Bet sizing is not simple, not secondary ... it's incredibly important [I say it's *everything*]
- LTCM trade sizing was all screwed up (position sizes were way too big)
- Global equities should have a positive expected return above the risk-free rate or inflation, trouble is the Sharpe Ratio
- Thorp inspired the coin-flipping experiment
- Haghani believes there are some rare people who can beat the market, trouble is finding them, identifying them in time
- Past returns are not indicative of future returns (because we don't have enough data)
- How do you identify the biased coin after only 30 flips? You can't, it takes 143 flips
- Need to find an investor or trader with 143 year track record
- "I don't have very much on the wisdom front"
- www.elmfunds.com
- Not on Twitter, "haven't figured it out"